The SAD Nation to
Come
Nothing lasts forever.
Nothing ever does. This is a fundamental truth, not only in
Julie Andrews song in The Sound of Music, but also in
science, religion and philosophy.
Certainly it is true in
economics, as everyone with retirement plans built around 401
or 457 plans can attest. It is true as we watch our children
grow, and as we age during the course of our careers and our
lifetimes. The shape and form of how our countrys political
institutions work are also subject to
changes.
This is an article about how
our political institutions appear to be moving. It is
also an article about how we might stop and think about
supporting and encouraging the change or finding an alternate
direction. To begin with, maneuvering anywhere in an
environment of change requires two very basic points. The
first is to know where you are. The second is to know what the
direction of change seems to be, or at least your best guess
at it.
In the case of American
government the HR Doctor, in a prior article entitled The
Second American Revolution, focused on the fact that state
governments appeared to be roaming around aimlessly trying to
decide what they are going to be when they grow up.
The position of state
government in the federal system has declined from being the
prime focus at the time of the founding of the Republic to
being organizations that cant quite cope. States are too big
to handle little problems successfully, like the protection of
an individual abused child. They are also certainly too small
to deal with many of the most important issues we will face as
a society. These include global warming, the power of
technology, multinational corporations, health care and
personal accountability deficits, Social Security reform and
much more.
States are retreating into
increasingly loud arenas for partisan bickering, whining and
budgets that never quite get balanced other than with a
short-term view lasting barely until the next
election.
There is an increasing worry
from this authors vantage point that the fundamental principle which has allowed our institutions to
function so brilliantly for more than two centuries is
at risk. That fundamental cornerstone is compromise and the
ability to act for a larger and more common good instead of
narrower litmus test interests.
Recall that more than two
centuries ago the concept of giant urban metropolitan areas
did not exist in America. The state seemed to be a natural
center for governance since we were at war literally and
figuratively with the concept of centralized power excesses,
especially by people who wore red coats. Combine that with the
rural, agricultural-based economy and about all that was left
was the concept of the individual colonies or states.
That has now changed
dramatically. The HR Doctor, for example, lives in a county which alone has a population larger
than that of 12 states. The world is different today.
Where will this change in
dynamics and demographics take us? This type
of question was raised ironically by the now retired HR
director St. Thomas Aquinas, who posed the philosophical
debating point How many angels can fit on the head of a
pin? The same can be asked when we look at government
organization.
America today has about
89,500 government organizations. This rather staggering
number, however, is down from more than 115,116 when World War
II began. The entire federal government counts as one with
each of the 50 states also counting as one. Given that only 51
of the 89,500 extend beyond the level of local or regional
government, where are the rest of these governments?
Certainly counties have not
caused the government population to be as large as it is.
There was roughly the same number of counties a generation ago
as there is today. In 1942 there were about 3,050.
Recent Census data tells us there are
3,033, not counting consolidated
city-county governments. Today there are about 19,492
municipalities, up from the 16, 220 in 1942.
You can begin to see a clear
trend if you imagine the very thrilling thought of inviting
the entire staff of the U.S. Census Bureau over to your home
for tea to review some of the predictive gems contained in the
data they produce. The Census Bureaus role is an absolutely
essential one in taking GPS readings of where our country is
and has been. After all, the Founding Fathers were no dummies.
They decided that the role of the census was so important that
it should be in the very First Article of the new Constitution
very close to the large letters that say We the People
.
According to census data the
number of school districts has declined tremendously from more
than 108,000 in 1942 to about 14,500 as of 2007. While the
number of counties and municipalities has remained fairly
constant, the big news may be found in the growth of
Special Assessment Districts (SAD). From 8,300 at World War
IIs beginning to the current roughly 37,400, the SAD news is
that this is a growth industry.
There are fire districts,
water districts, lighting districts, recreation and park
districts, hospital districts and much more. These special
districts are financed by assessments, usually found in small
print on property tax bills. The assessments allow the
functions to be managed while escaping
the clutches and, increasingly, the handcuffs of
General Fund dollar competition in other government entities
like cities and counties.
The beginning of this
article noted that everything changes. There may perhaps be
one exception and that is a universal disdain for paying
taxes.
The trend suggests that we
will continue to see a decline in the ability of state
governments to figure out what their place in the world is. It
will also be awhile before citizens realize they dont need
fire stations from multiple jurisdictions covering their
territories only a few minutes away from one another. There
will, however, be an increasing search by the vested-interest
leaders in specific government operations to escape from the
General Fund.
The attractive escape route
will increasingly be found in the creation of Special
Assessment Districts. As this article was being written, the
Florida Legislature was considering a bill that would remove
fire services from General Fund reliance and make them SAD
cases. That would be the good news and generate parties
throughout the state hosted by the fire unions. The bad
news would be that it would be a tax swap in which local
government property taxes would be reduced.
The result will be economic
security for the true heroes and a setback for the idea of
reform of the fire service. It would mean more difficulty for
local governments to manage their own affairs, and make
decisions about the services and level of services at the
local level.
Another bit of SAD news is
that this type of government will be more distant from the
general population than is a city or county. The more removed,
the less oversight. America is evolving more and more toward
government through special assessment districts as a quick,
snappy, and in the long run, probably the wrong answer to the
frustrations which are growing about
the current system.
At some point, this quiet
revolution will grow louder and louder to the point where our
country will even consider changing its name. It will no
longer be the United States of America. It will become the
United Special Districts of America the USDA.
This change may excite
American farmers, although their numbers are declining
steadily. It is questionable whether it will excite government
leaders to change direction and to begin to create rational
service boundaries, consortia and coalitions that focus on the
best government at the least cost for the greatest number of
people.
Perhaps instead of creating
a new SAD species, what we really need is thoughtful leaders
with an over-the-horizon vision of the future to bravely
create long-term stable funding, to innovate and end the
dysfunctional squabbling over silos in favor of governments
that are more local, more accountable and more
service-delivery transparent.
Phil Rosenberg The HR
Doctor http://www.hrdr.net/
|